Journal: International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Article Title: Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments
doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00581-8
Figure Lengend Snippet: Detailed information extracted from studies included in this systematic review [part 2]
Article Snippet: Perez et al. [ ] , Standard healing abutment (cylindrical/convex) , Fabricated in resin after an impression taken with the pick-up impression copings using a polyether material (insertion within 24 h after implant placement) , Resin rand-made , Screw-retained crown (4 months after implant placement) , Papilla Index Pink Esthetic Score (PES) , (a) Comparison of the changes of soft tissues facial soft tissue level, width of keratinized gingiva (b) comparison of changes of the peri-implant bone level (c) comparison of implant success rate (d) comparison of implant failure and complication rate (biological and technical complications) , 100% , 100% , Using a random permutation sequence generator (Statistics Toolbox, MatLab 7.11, The MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) without any kind of minimization of confounding factors such as age, smoking habit, gender, and tooth position statistician was blind clinicians were calibrated.
Techniques: Control, Selection, Polymer, Injection, Comparison, Sequencing